Two-Buck
Chuck's father tells competitors to stop whining
by
Jerry Hirsch, Los Angeles Times
January 7, 2004
LODI - Here on the western edge of the Sierra foothills,
underneath the soaring cooling towers of the defunct Rancho
Seco nuclear power plant, 5,000 acres of rock-strewn
vineyards mark the birthplace of Fred Franzia's Two-Buck
Chuck.
As the amiable and ample Franzia leads a visitor through neatly
planted cabernet sauvignon vines, he discusses why he's
perplexed that his Bronco Wine Co., which makes the $1.99
wine sold exclusively at Trader Joe's stores in California,
has become the bane of the industry. Franzia is facing
litigation over labeling practices and criticism from
retailers and distributors who fear their profit margins
will erode if the popularity of low-priced wine grows.
To his thinking, the Charles Shaw brand and inexpensive labels such
as Estrella, ForestVille and Napa Ridge have done a lot to
promote California wines by fighting the deluge of cheap
imports and reducing the state's grape glut.
In a rare interview, Franzia, whose family has made wine in
California for 110 years, talked with the Los Angeles Times
about California's wine industry, his business and the
Two-Buck Chuck phenomenon.
How
can you sell wine at a price point so low that Trader Joe's
can offer it for $1.99 in California?
Our
vineyards are so efficient. (Bronco controls 30,000 acres of
California vineyards.) We have vineyards where you drive
three miles before you have to turn the tractor around. Do
you know how much money I save on rubber by turning the
tractor less and not using up tires compared to the average
farmer who is turning his tractor every quarter-mile?
The efficiencies of maintaining large acreages allow us to pick
tonnages at lower cost. There is nothing like watching 20 or
30 harvesters go out and pick 120 truckloads. It is like an
orchestra operating. Trucks moving 3,000 tons of grapes a
night. Everything is done on a mass scale, correctly and
efficiently. Our strategy is to fish where the fish are. I
think more people in the marketplace are buying wines
costing $2 to $8. If we felt there was more business at the
higher price strata we would be in that market.
You
will sell more than 60 million bottles of Charles Shaw this
year. Are you making money?
Yes.
The margin varies with every batch. But I am not going to
give you an answer as to what the margins are. Just
remember, we aren't losing weight over this.
What's
your company's annual revenue?
You
would not be out of order guesstimating $250 million. We
processed 300,000 tons this year, plus or minus. It is the
equivalent of around 20 million cases of wine. We sell over
half of that at the retail level. (The rest is sold as bulk
wine to other wine companies.)
Industry
lore says you are buying up tanks of highbrow wine on the
bulk market and using that for the Shaw label. Or is it most
of your own fruit and then you use bulk wine for blending?
What's the truth?
I
can't give you a 100 percent answer that would be true for
every variety. It moves around. I am not trying to be
evasive; that is just part of the process.
Our winemakers blend to keep consistency in the wine taste. They
have access to a wide range of grape products that we have
in our wineries to do that. Some wines might be blended with
petit verdot or cabernet franc or shiraz, depending on the
winemaker's taste. It is up to him to keep the consistency.
Overall, our company grows about 60 percent of our grapes and
purchases about 40 percent of what we process.
Why
don't we see more $1.99 wines in the markets?
There
is no reason why more retailers in California can't be doing
the same. Some retailers are buying similar wine from us at
about the same price, and they are selling it to their
consumers at a higher markup. I am not going to name names.
Charles Shaw has done wonders for our company. I think Trader Joe's
has been an instrumental partner in this combination. They
are willing to sell the consumer a product at such a fair
price.
How
does the average consumer walking down the wine aisle know
the difference between a $5, $8, $15 or $50 bottle of wine?
The
consumer has to make the trial and error with his own palate
and taste buds. Don't listen to some wine writer's rating
system that is just numbers. Somebody might rate a wine at
94 points, but you as a consumer might not like it and then
say, ``If I can't appreciate what somebody said was a 94,
then I am not going to go buy wine.''
There is an old-fashioned way of finding wine that works. You try
it, you taste it and, if you like it, buy it. If you don't
like it, don't buy it. We feel very confident that if you
taste our wines, you will buy our wines and continue to buy
them.
You're
involved in a legal battle with the Napa Valley Vintners
Association over the use of names such as Napa Ridge on
bottles that don't contain grapes from Napa Valley. What do
you think of their complaint?
There
is a vocal minority that is leading some of them on a quest
to put Napa on a pedestal. But we don't believe in that.
``Napa'' could mean auto parts to most people. To us, it is
just the location where we bottle our wines.
But
why bottle wines there when you don't grow grapes there?
The
reason we built the bottling operation there was because we
have customers whom we bottle for and they wanted it located
there so that they can watch the bottling of their products.
We had completed and opened that plant long before we
introduced Shaw. (Certain Charles Shaw labels say ``Cellared
& bottled in Napa.'')
Even
though you are a nephew of Ernest Gallo, people say you have
a ``prickly'' relationship with the wine industry
establishment. Why is that?
Well,
there may be some people who don't know me and who have
operations and might want to throw rocks because of my
success and their lack of success or their financial
problems or they can't sell their wine. They can't blame me
for that. I didn't go there and tell them to try to build
some monument of a winery.
California vintners should be concerned with promoting California
wines and planning for the future to make us competitive
instead of being prickly in their opinions about the people
who are trying to be competitive.
|